सदस्य चर्चा:QueerEcofeminist

विकिबुक्स कडून
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Deletion request[संपादन]

Hi, could you please review this deletion request? [१] Rschen7754 २१:५०, ३१ जुलै २०२२ (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes check.svg झाले., the author had requested deletion of page created by mistake. Thanks QueerEcofeminist🌈 ००:३८, १ ऑगस्ट २०२२ (UTC)Reply[reply]

वर्ग:Deleteme[संपादन]

Hi! You deleted वर्ग:Deleteme without any explanation (apart from the default summary). This was connected to d:Q5964, the Wikidata item collecting speedy deletion categories. Are you sure you wanted to delete the category, not only its content? If yes, is there maybe a Marathi-language category for the same purpose that you could add to the Wikidata item? Or is the process of speedy deletion unused here? —Tacsipacsi (चर्चा) १३:२२, २८ सप्टेंबर २०२२ (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Tacsipacsi, Yeah I know, I am just rearranging it. Last night I was looking for deletion cats and there are multiple categories which doesn't really collect the actual pages for deletions here. Give me some time I will fix it. No need for any other speculations. thanks QueerEcofeminist🌈 १३:४८, २८ सप्टेंबर २०२२ (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Tacsipacsi, this message from your side was totally unexpected as I was taking care of it and I want gs and stewards to look after most of the tasks here. So almost I have created same cat all across Mr projects. But you guys have no patience, no agf I want to tell you that entire tone of your message and speculations are not at all acceptable considering agf. QueerEcofeminist🌈 १४:०१, २८ सप्टेंबर २०२२ (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Tacsipacsi,
  • Hu.wikibooks crat is inactive for more than a year. Don't you guys have any inactivity policies?
  • Important there is a global bot policy that forbids from giving bot flag to any humane user accounts. How your human account has a bot flag permanently. That too to your admin account. Admin bot could be very dangerous. Until unless there is a local policy for it and it ensures that there would be no missuse. You shouldn't be having bot flag to human account.
The whole scenario on your homewiki is ambiguous and shady still your lurking on other wikis? Please take care of these issues first as inactive crat for one year after granting such disastrous rights is really scary. Thanks QueerEcofeminist🌈 १५:३७, २८ सप्टेंबर २०२२ (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I did assume good faith. I wrote “Are you sure you wanted to…?”, not “You ****, why on earth did you…?” or something like that.
  • “But you guys have no patience” – I (and not “we”, btw) wrote about 21 hours after you deleted the page. This is well enough time to finish everything, unless it’s something really large-scale (which it turned out to be, but I found this less likely than being in – good-faith – error, as – across wikis – speedy deletion categories are deleted more often mistakenly than intentionally).
  • “Don't you guys have any inactivity policies?” – no, we don’t have any local inactivity policies, so global m:Admin activity review applies.
  • “Important there is a global bot policy that forbids from giving bot flag to any humane user accounts.” – I’ve somehow overlooked this rule, thanks for pointing it out! I’ll be cooperative on Meta to resolve this policy violation.
  • “The whole scenario on your homewiki is ambiguous and shady still your lurking on other wikis?” – is there a rule forbidding editing wikis other than my “home wiki” as long as there’s an ambiguous or even clearly policy-violating case there; or is it just you not assuming good faith?
Tacsipacsi (चर्चा) १७:२४, ३० सप्टेंबर २०२२ (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I accept that there was no reason and whatever was not in English and the summary visible doesn't not convey What I want to. But there are other things one should consider while doing anything about it.
I am assuming most of the questions were answered on meta. Problem of tone still persists. I am not saying you can't go and ask questions or check or edit on other projects. But I have strong problem with when your questions start with assumptions or speculations like,
  • Are you sure you wanted to delete the category, not only its content?
  • Or is the process of speedy deletion unused here?
why you are so worried about things which a concerned user is already taking care anyways. If you would have looked into history a bit [[२]] you might not have gotten into these questions. And believed that I will fix it in a day or two.
  • Importantly, No system was broken or there was no emergency situation caused by my deletion. It was anyway wrong category which never captured actual pages for deletion.
  • My next edit after deletion was this Special:Diff/13412. If you would have looked at it. you might have understood what I was trying to do. But no, instead of
    • Waiting for a while, which you did not, you were in great hurry to show me down.
    • Looking at histories and edits, you ignored everything and came to ask me about why did I deleted it and started all this rubbish.
    • And now you are still trying to rationalize your actions of interfering in the project processes whose language you are not aware. Interestingly when you dont even know what processes we follow here.
QueerEcofeminist🌈 १६:०५, १ ऑक्टोबर २०२२ (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Tacsipacsi, hope this ends now. As it amounts to stalking and harassing now. I have to admit its not fruitful by any means. QueerEcofeminist🌈 १६:०७, १ ऑक्टोबर २०२२ (UTC)Reply[reply]